Academic Research to Policy: Why Academics Must Learn to Communicate with the Public

Can you imagine that there are great researchers who could reform a policy for the real good but are ignored without any genuine reason? Do you think this type of ignorance improves the decision-making of policymakers for the betterment of the country and the world?

One of those was Dr. James Hansen, who stated to the US Congress the root cause of global warming in 1988. Through his work, he shared the threats to climate change due to the exploitation of carbon energy sources and predicted that climate change is related to the greenhouse effect. He also emphasized how ‘clean coal’ is responsible for global warming.

Besides that, Robert Shiller spent years researching market bubbles before the financial crisis of 2008. He wrote about housing market bubbles after studying deeply how people make risky financial decisions in excitement.

From the above two examples, it is clear that predictions can help us with precautionary steps. But most of the time, research is not utilized as it should be, and it fails to reach the decision-makers who could prevent a crisis. Here, the problem is not poor research, but the communication gap.

Missing Link Between Research and Policy

We have excellent researchers in all fields, but one of the notable difficulties is the use of complex terms in research. Each one has a different style and pattern, which includes the use of language as well. What policymakers seek while making policy is to find simple answers in easy language to complex questions.

Let’s talk about IPCC reports. They provide a summary for policymakers, but when it comes to the report, some may find it difficult to interpret due to the rich data.

If gaps are reduced, then excellent results can be obtained. For example, the government of India has translated complex academic research while working on the National Educational Policy 2020.

It is the different publication cycles for the researchers, which may be monthly or sometimes yearly. But policy decisions happen in weeks or, in a few cases, days. Hence, the real problem is the ‘research to practice’ gap, which means the time of converting the research findings into practical policy implementations.

However, this problem can be solved with proper infrastructure facilities. For instance, with an intention of improving human health, Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs) in the US provide programs to researchers to help them improve the quality of their work.

Additionally, the main problem here is the format of their research work. Academic writings are written for fellow researchers, and they contain extensive literature reviews. It also includes detailed descriptions of how data was collected and analyzed, and intellectual hedging with conclusions. While the policymakers require concise summaries with clear guidelines and practical steps. So that they can save their time to go through comprehensive frameworks to find actionable insights.

Do you know the worst part here? A perception gap. Sometimes researchers put recommendations with stipulated conditions. The policymakers also ignore policies prepared without practical solutions. Focusing strongly on complex terms and structures can make research more complicated to understand for policymakers.

Need for Speaking Up

In my opinion, public communication is not optional for academic researchers but should be treated as a core professional responsibility. Most academic research is funded by the public directly or indirectly. There is an implicit social contract here as society invests in research with the expectation that it will ultimately yield benefits for its good. When academics publish their work only in specialized journals read by a handful of people, they are breaching the terms.

There are studies that show academic research with broader public engagement has received significantly more attention. Altmetrics also include a correlation with high academic citations. However, this relationship depends on the field and methodology.

It can be rightly stated that successful researchers throughout history did not just wait for policymakers to discover their work, but they proactively shared it. Those people focused on specific solutions to the respective problems. They engaged directly with decision-makers instead of speaking with their research fellows.

The Toolkit for Academic Engagement

For today’s researchers, the foundation is learning to lead with implications rather than methodology. Successful academic communicators begin with a research purpose and consider its implications for real-world decisions rather than jumping directly into research design. Below are the key approaches:

Writing op-eds:

This represents one of the most direct paths to influence the policy. An op-ed can reach thousands of policymakers, journalists, and opinion leaders in a single day. But most graduate programs do not teach how to write an effective op-ed. This includes crafting compelling headlines and structuring arguments for a general audience to make complex ideas accessible without oversimplifying.

Social media networks:

These allow researchers to communicate key findings and engage in public discussions. The most successful academic communicators use these platforms not just to broadcast research, but to participate in ongoing policy conversations. These help researchers get the opportunity to build audiences that include policymakers and business leaders.

Collaborating with Organizations:

Another effective strategy is to collaborate with organizations like think tanks, policy institutes, and advocacy groups. This strategy can be considered the most suitable because these organizations are specialized in translating research into policy recommendations and have established relationships with decision-makers.

The key to all these strategies is consistency and authenticity, since doing it once rarely makes a difference. The academics who successfully influence policy treat public engagement as an ongoing professional responsibility.

Promoting the Infrastructure for Impact

Individual communication efforts are not sufficient to solve the research-policy gap systematically. Universities, funding agencies, and research institutions need to make amendments in how they operate. For instance, several universities in the UK have adopted the Research Excellence Framework (REF) as it directly evaluates the research impact beyond academic referencing. This system measures how research influences policy, practice, or public understanding.

Ever since its implementation, there has been a remarkable increase in partnership between academics and non-academic partners in the UK. This creates real incentives for academics to engage with the broader world. One practical example can be seen in a case study from The University of Manchester:

Stephanie Barrientos, the Professor of Global Development, highlighted the benefits of promoting gender equality in global value chains. Her research had started showing its impact in many big corporations, like:
- Over 390,000 workers at Nike and Mondelez’ have directly benefited from the implementation of the gender-equality strategy.
- Over 1 million workers in Marks & Spencers and Ethical Trading Initiative member companies have benefited by placing women in leadership positions.
- By adopting Barrientos’ strategy, Sedex, a major social compliance body, reached 33 million workers across 180 countries from 60,000 members.

As part of grant applications, good funding agencies also require public engagement. For example, the National Science Foundation (NSF) requires researchers to explain the broader impacts of their proposed research. It should also include how they will communicate findings to non-academic audiences.

Still, universities could do more. Most doctoral programs provide extensive training in research methodology but little instruction in public communications. Graduate students learn to write for academic journals but never learn to write policy briefs. They master statistical analysis but never learn to explain their findings to non-experts.

Apparently, forward-thinking institutions are already addressing this issue. Several universities have introduced courses related to science communication, policy writing, and media interaction. While others have introduced fellowship programs where researchers join hands with journalists.

What Practices Other Nations Are Following?

Do you know that several nations have created systematic ways of enhancing research-policy communication?

Australia’s national research assessment requires universities to demonstrate research impact beyond academic publications. Policy citations of Australian research have increased remarkably since its incorporation.
European countries have created dedicated funding streams for research communication and established national programs to train academics in public engagement skills.

The common thread is recognition that research communication is a skill that can be learned and developed. Countries that treat it as such see measurably better research-policy integration.

What Price does Silence Pay?

Academic researchers face a bitter reality. If their findings are not communicated effectively and on time, the gap is filled with outdated assumptions. In the absence of the best evidence, the gap is filled by political agendas or simply the loudest voices.

This is happening in every policy domain:

Environmental policies are being debated without having enough input from climate scientists.
Economic policies are being designed without useful insights from behavioural economists.

Thus, the absence of academic researchers creates space for misleading information and political influence that covers the truth. In an era where the public’s trust in expertise is already weak, the withdrawal of credible academic voices might threaten evidence-based policymaking.

Challenge for Every Researcher

At present, the world is facing an increasing number of complex problems that demand expert knowledge. The traditional academic models are no longer served, which include publishing in a journal, presenting at a conference, and moving on to the next grant.

So, what, according to you, does a dynamic model look like?

Established researchers might include acquiring new skills and connecting with unfamiliar audiences.
Graduate students and early-career researchers may face challenges to build communication skills with research expertise at an early stage.
University administrators and funding officials must develop systematic support for research communication and recognize public engagement as a valid academic achievement.

Final Thoughts

We are standing on a threshold where both challenges and opportunities lie ahead. New possibilities are opening up in research communication through emerging technologies. However, technology is not the whole answer. The real challenge lies deep in the system. The academia requires a cultural shift, a recognition that public communication is not a distraction from serious scholarship but an essential expression of it. In the near future, the question will not be whether academic research can affect policy, but how quickly and effectively it can do so.

Thus, the scholars who learn to navigate this new landscape would be better researchers and architects of a more evidence-based society. This prediction may not be promised as it requires deliberate effort. Institutional support and individual commitment from researchers across all disciplines are equally mandatory. The tools exist, and the need is urgent. The only question is whether we will use them?

Academic Research to Policy: Why Academics Must Learn to Communicate with the Public

Missing Link Between Research and Policy

Need for Speaking Up

The Toolkit for Academic Engagement

What Practices Other Nations Are Following?

What Price does Silence Pay?

Challenge for Every Researcher

Final Thoughts

References:

Share this:

Comments

Leave a comment Cancel reply